Chinese Whispers? The Congruence Between Maltese FE Organizations’ Missions and Government Policy For the Sector

Nicholas Zarb

Abstract


This paper delineates the assessed alignment between the Maltese government’s policy for the further education sector (FE) and FE organizations’ missions. Since alignment is multifaceted, a complementarity blended approach was used to help uncover its complexities. Data were collected from seven FE vocational and academic organizations via questionnaires to academic staff; interviews with principals and other internal and external stakeholders; content analysis of mission statements. Data showed that there is only moderate alignment between organizational mission and government policy with large vocational organizations displaying more alignment with such policies.The use of a complementarity blended method may be useful to explain educational alignment in other small states. Short bureaucratic distances are not a guarantee of alignment.

 

 


Keywords


further education; mixed method; small island states; Malta

Full Text:

PDF

References


AchieveInc. (2008). Making College and Career Readiness the Mission for High Schools.Washington: Achieve Inc.

Akiba, M., LeTrende, G. K., & Scribner, J. P. (2007).Teacher Quality, Opportunity Gap, and National Achievement in 46 Countries.Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369–387.

Akinyemi, K. (1987). Aligning Practice with Policy in Vocational-technical

Education.Vocational Aspect of Education, 39(102), 15–18.

Alcock, P. (2003). The Subject of Social Policy: The Student’s Companion to Public Policy. P. Alcock, A. Erskine & M. May. Cornwall, Blackwell.

Alebaikan, R., & Salah Troudi, S. (2010). Online Discussion in Blended Courses at Saudi Universities.Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 2(2), 507–514.

Aversano, L., Grasso, C., &Tortorella, M. (2009). A Framework for Measuring the Alignment between Business Processes and Software Systems.Communications in

Computer and Information Science, 59(1), 213–220.

Azevedo, A., Apfelthaler, G., & Hurst, D. (2012). Competency Development in Business Graduates: An Industry-driven Approach for Examining the Alignment of Undergraduate Business Education with Industry Requirements. The International Journal of Management Education, 10(1), 12–28.

Balzer, C., &Rusconi, A. (2007).From the European Commission to the Member States and Back? A Comparison of the Bologna and Bruges-Copenhagen Processes: New Arenas of Educational Governance. K. Martens, A. Rusconi& K. Leuze, Basingstoke, Palgrave.

Barslund, M. (2012).Recent Developments in Selected Education Indicators and Their Relation to Europe 2020 Targets.National Institute Economic Review, 220(4), 6–18.

Bazaley, P., & Kemp, L. (2011). Mosaics, Triangles and DNA: Metaphors for

Integrated Analysis in Mixed Methods.Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 55–72.

Bell, L., & Stevenson, H. (2006).Education Policy: Process, Themes and Impact. London: Routledge.

Berg, A., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J. (2003). Mission Possible: Enabling Good Work in Higher Education. Change, 35(5), 40–47.

Boggs, G. (2007). Lessons in Leadership: Will Community Colleges Save the Day? Community College Journal, 31(8), 14–17.

Bonal, X. (2004). Is the World Bank Education Policy Adequate for Fighting Poverty? Some Evidence from Latin America.International Journal of Educational Development, 24(6), 649–666.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Thematic Analysis and Code Development: Transforming Qualitative Information. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006).Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to Do When Stakeholders Matter. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53.

Caldwell, B. J. (2008). A New Framework for Understanding How Transformation Occurs in Schools.The International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Auckland, New Zealand.

Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance.Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92−117.

Crossley, M., Bray, M., & Packer, S. (2011). Education in Small States: Policies and Priorities. Hampshire: Commonwealth Secretariat.

Dalley-Trim, L., Alloway, N., & Walker, K. (2008). Secondary School Students’ Perceptions of, and the Factors Influencing Their Decision-Making in Relation to, VET in Schools. The Australian Educational Researcher, 35(2), 55–69.

Duffy, F. M. (2004). Moving Upward Together: Creating Strategic Alignment to Sustain Systemic School Improvement. USA: Scarecrow Education.

Dunkel, T. (2009).The Bologna Process between Structural Convergence and Institutional Diversity.European Journal of Vocational Training, 46(1), 174–196.

EducationDepartment. (1988). Development of Education, 1986–1988. The 41th Session of the International Conference on Education,Geneva.

Farrugia, C. J. (2002). Rewards and Tribulations of Senior Education Managers in Small States.Education Planning and Management in Small States: Concepts and Experiences. G. Baldacchino& C. J. Farrugia. Essex, Commonwealth Secretariat.

Fleming, J. (2012). Partnerships and Relationships in Cooperative Education: Are Stakeholder Perspectives Aligned?Acen National Conference.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.

Gatt, S. (2009). The Impact of the Bologna Process on Higher Education Institutions in Malta. Brussels: UEPA.

Hantrais, L. (2003). Social Policy and the European Union.The Student’s Companion to Social Policy.P. Alcock, A. Erskine & M. May. Cornwall, Blackwell.

Hogwood, B. W., & Gunn, L. A. (1984).Policy Analysis for the Real World. Great Britain: Oxford University Press.

Honig, M. (2006). Complexity and Policy Implementation: Challenges and Opportunities for the Field. New Directions in Education Policy Implementation: Confronting Complexity. M. Honig. USA: State University of New York Press.

Honig, M., & Hatch, T. C. (2004). How Schools Strategically Manage Multiple, External Demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16–30.

Hope, W. C. (2002). Implementing Educational Policy: Some Considerations for Principals.The Clearing House, 76(1), 40–43.

Horsburgh, D. (2003). Evaluation of Qualitative Research.Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12(2), 307–312.

Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003).Public Policy, Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems (2 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Huang, T. (2012). Agents’ Social Imagination: The ‘Invisible’ Hand of Neoliberalism in Taiwan’s Curriculum Reform. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(1), 39–45.

Johnson, N. (2003). State Welfare.The Student’s Companion to Public Policy.P. Alcock, A. Erskine & M. May. Cornwall, Blackwell.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2006).Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies. USA: Harvard Business School Press.

Kent, E. F. (2012). .What Are You Going to Do with a Degree in That? Arguing for the Humanities in an Era of Efficiency. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 11(3), 273–284.

Good, J. M., &Kochan, F. (2008). Creating a Quality Program by Linking Strategic Planning and Assessment through Collaboration.The annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Hilton New Orleans Riverside, New Orleans.

Keating, J. (2006). Post-school Articulation in Australia: A Case of Unresolved Tensions. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 30(1), 59–74.

Kvale, S. (1996).Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: Sage.

Labovitz, G., & Rosansky, V. (1997).The Power of Alignment: How Great Companies Stay Centered and Accomplish Extraordinary Things. USA: John Wiley and Sons.

Levin, J. S. (1999). Missions and Structures: Bringing Clarity to Perceptions about Globalization and Higher Education in Canada. Higher Education, 37(1), 377–399.

Lumby, J. (2007). Parent Voice: Knowledge, Values and Viewpoint. Improving Schools, 10(3), 220–232.

Machin, S., &Vignoles, A. (2006).Education Policy in the UK. London: Centre for the Economics of Education.

Maclean, R., &Pavlova, M. (2010).Planning and policy development for technical vocational education and training systems.International Encyclopedia of Education. P. Peterson, E. Baker & B. McGaw. Oxford, Elsevier.

Mather, K., Worrall, L., & Seifert, R. (2007).Reforming Further Education: The Changing Labour Process for College Lecturers.Personnel Review, 36(1), 109–127.

McCullough, B. D., &Heiser, D. A. (2008).On the Accuracy of Statistical Procedures in Microsoft Excel 2007.Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52(10), 4570–4578.

McTavish, D. (2006). Further Education Management Strategy and Policy: Institutional and Public Management Dimensions. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 34(3), 411–428.

Mintzberg, H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. New York: Prentice Hall.

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853−886.

Nairn, K., & Higgins, J. (2011). The Emotional Geographies of Neoliberal School Reforms: Spaces of Refuge and Containment. Emotion, Space and Society, 4(3), 180–186.

NCHE.(2009). Further and Higher Education Strategy 2020. Valletta: National Commission for Higher Education.

Newton, K., & van Deth, J. W. (2005).Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

OECD. (2008). Systemic Innovation in the Danish VET System: Country Case Study Report. Paris: OECD.

Ortiz, N. (2008). Guiding P-20 Education Alignment: A Reference for Colorado’s Education Community. Colorado: Center for Education Policy Analysis.

Powell, J. J. W., Bernhard, N., & Graf, L. (2012). The Emergent European model in Skill Formation: Comparing Higher Education and Vocational Training in the Bologna and Copenhagen Processes. Sociology of Education, 85(3), 240–258.

Rephann, T. J. (2007). Community College Growth Opportunities: Untapped Potential in America's Heartland? Growth and Change, 38(3), 443–459.

Robson, C. (2004). Real World Research (2 ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Rowley, T. (1997).Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences.Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910.

Spillane, J. P. (2008). Policy, Politics, and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report: Topology, Functions and Limits. Educational Researcher, 37(9), 638–644.

Stone, J. E. (2001). Aligning Teacher Training with Public Policy.The State Education Standard, 1(1), 34–38.

Taylor, S., L., R., Lingard, B., & Henry, M. (1997).Educational Policy and the Politics of Change. UK: Routledge.

Van Riel., C. B. M. (2012). The Alignment Factor: Leveraging the Power of Total Stakeholder Support. London: Routledge.

Warren, L. A. (2006). Information Literacy in Community Colleges: Focused on Learning. Information, Literacy and Instruction, 45(4), 297–303.

Woolhouse, C., & Cochrane, M. (2009). Is Subject Knowledge the Be All and End All? Investigating Professional Development for Science Teachers.Improving Schools, 12(2), 160–173.

Xerri, C. J. (1990). The Development of Education, 1988–1990: National Report for Malta.The 42th Session of the International Conference on Education, Geneva.

Yeatman, A. (1990). Bureaucrats, Femcrats, Technocrats: Essays on the Contemporary Australian State. Australia: Allen and Unwin.

Yin, R. (2011).Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: The Guilford Press.

Yin, R. (2003).Case Study Research Design and Methods (3 ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.apmba.2013.002.01.1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.