A Cross-Country Comparison of the Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation Between Indonesia and Thailand: Do Gender and Culture matter ?
Abstract
Despite the increased concerns about the significance of CSR for business, only a few empirical studies of CSR orientation are available. Understanding stakeholders’ CSR orientations are pivotal to devising appropriate CSR strategies. This study investigates perceptions of CSR Orientation among Indonesian and Thai consumers and examines economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic dimensions. A questionnaire with an imperative scale to measure relative importance was administered to 300 business students in both countries. Findings revealed that economic responsibility ranked the highest for both groups, aligning with previous empirical studies. However, significant variations emerged regarding legal, ethical, and philanthropic priorities. Thai consumers emphasized ethical responsibility, while their Indonesian counterparts prioritized legal and philanthropic dimensions. These distinctions challenged the universality of CSR frameworks, establishing a new perspective on the substantial influence of cultural, regulatory, and societal factors. Further, the study punctuated the demand for companies to adjust CSR strategies adhering to distinct national contexts. To strengthen comprehension of CSR orientations, further study is advised to explore cross-cultural differences, the impact of developmental stages, and diverse sample demographics. These findings encompass significant implications for businesses operating in multiple cultural settings, emphasizing the imperative of adapting CSR practices to engage with local communities and consumers effectively.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Reference
Ameer, F., & R. Khan, N. (2019). National Culture, Employee’s Engagement and Employee’s CSR Perceptions in Technology Based Firms of Pakistan. Journal of Management Sciences, 6(2), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.1906205
Archie B. Carroll. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons.
Arli, D., Bucic, T., Harris, J., & Lasmono, H. (2014). Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Among Indonesian College Students. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 15(3), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2014.934634
Aupperle, K., Hatfield, J. D., & Carroll, A. B. (1983). Instrument Development and Application in Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1983(1), 369–373. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1983.4976378
Bir, Ç. S. (2009). CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ORIENTATION AND EMPLOYER ATTRACTIVENESS. Journal of Yasar University.
Bucic, T., Harris, J., & Arli, D. (2012). Ethical Consumers Among the Millennials: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1151-z
Burton, B. K., & Hegarty, W. H. (1999). Some Determinants of Student Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation. Business & Society, 38(2), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800204
Coles, T., Fenclova, E., & Dinan, C. (2013). Tourism and corporate social responsibility: A critical review and research agenda. Tourism Management Perspectives, 6, 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2013.02.001
Dirk Matten & Jeremy Moon. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458
Galvão, A., Mendes, L., Marques, C., & Mascarenhas, C. (2019). Factors influencing students’ corporate social responsibility orientation in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.059
Grosser, K., & Moon, J. (2019). CSR and Feminist Organization Studies: Towards an Integrated Theorization for the Analysis of Gender Issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(2), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3510-x
Haski-Leventhal, D., Pournader, M., & McKinnon, A. (2017). The Role of Gender and Age in Business Students’ Values, CSR Attitudes, and Responsible Management Education: Learnings from the PRME International Survey. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(1), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2936-2
Holtbrügge, D., & Oberhauser, M. (2019). CSR orientation of future top managers in India. Journal of Indian Business Research, 11(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-01-2018-0039
Kahreh, M. S., Babania, A., Tive, M., & Mirmehdi, S. M. (2014). An Examination to Effects of Gender Differences on the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 664–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.525
McGuinness, P. B., Vieito, J. P., & Wang, M. (2017). The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.001
Oyvind Ihlen, Jennifer L. Bartlett, & Steve May. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility and Communication. In The Handbook of Communication and Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 3–22). Wiley.
Rattanasirivilai, S., Somjai, S., & Deeprasert, D. (2020). The Role of Gender as a Moderator Linking Corporate Social Responsibility Perception to Employees Engagement: A Study in the Services Sector of Thailand. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3898422
Ren, L., Lu, J., Zhang, C., Liang, M., Stasiulis, N., & Streimikis, J. (2020). Impacts of Feminist Ethics and Gender on the Implementation of CSR Initiatives. Filosofija. Sociologija, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.v31i1.4175
Robyn Walker, Charalambos Kanellopoulos, Maria Papanayiotou, & Antonios Vitalis. (2003). An investigation of CSR orientations among Greek university students.
Rosati, F., Costa, R., Calabrese, A., & Pedersen, E. R. G. (2018a). Employee attitudes towards corporate social responsibility: A study on gender, age and educational level differences. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1306–1319. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1640
Rosati, F., Costa, R., Calabrese, A., & Pedersen, E. R. G. (2018b). Employee attitudes towards corporate social responsibility: A study on gender, age and educational level differences. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1306–1319. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1640
Sánchez-Hernández, M. I., Carvalho, L. C., & Paiva, I. S. (2019). Orientation towards social responsibility of North-West African firms. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 10(2), 365–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2018-0171
Schmidt, M. A., & Cracau, D. (2018). A Cross-Country Comparison of the Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation in Germany and Qatar: An Empirical Study among Business Students. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 37(1), 67–104. https://doi.org/10.5840/bpej201712866
Smith, W. J., Wokutch, R. E., Harrington, K. V., & Dennis, B. S. (2001). An Examination of the Influence of Diversity and Stakeholder Role on Corporate Social Orientation. Business & Society, 40(3), 266–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030104000303
Srisuphaolarn, P. (2013). From altruistic to strategic CSR: How social value affected CSR development – a case study of Thailand. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(1), 56–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111311307813
T. Tsoulfas, G. (2023). Supply Chains and Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i1.12648
Visser, W., Matten, D., Pohl, M., & Tolhurst, N. (Eds.). (2012). Front Matter. In The A to Z of Corporate Social Responsibility (1st ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119205944.fmatter
Visser, Wayne. (2006). CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES.
Wendy Chapple & Jeremy Moon. (n.d.). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A Seven-Country Study of CSR Web Site Reporting. Business & Society, 2005 44: 415.
Yasser, Q. R., Al Mamun, A., & Ahmed, I. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Diversity: Insights from Asia Pacific. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1400
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.