The Effect of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Easy to Use on Student Satisfaction The Mediating Role of Attitude to Use Online Learning
Abstract
The aims of this study is to analyze an empirical research model on the effect of perceived usefulness and perceived ease to use on student satisfaction with the mediating role of attitude to use online learning. The sample of this study were students from the Faculty of Economics and Business, Yogyakarta Muhammadiyah University. An empirical model and hypothesis testing was analyze using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) of the AMOS 23 program. The design of this study uses a quantitative approach. A sample of 203 students were tested in this study. The sampling technique used purposive sampling. The results of hypothesis testing show that there is a positive and significant effect between perceived usefulness and satisfaction and attitude. Perceived easy to use has a significant positive effect on attitude to use online learning but not significant on student satisfaction. Attitude to use online learning has a significant positive effect on student satisfaction.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abu-Al-Aish, A., Love, S. J. I. R. o. R. i. O., & Learning, D. (2013). Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: An investigation in higher education. 14(5), 82-107.
Akram, H., Aslam, S., Saleem, A., & Parveen, K. J. J. o. I. T. E. R. (2021). The challenges of online teaching in COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of public universities in Karachi, Pakistan. 20, 263.
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., & Sinclair, J. (2017). Identifying success factors for e-learning in higher education. Paper presented at the International conference on e-learning.
Alam, S. S., & Sayuti, N. M. (2011). Applying the theory of planned behavior (TPB) in halal food purchasing. International Journal of Commerce and Management, Vol. 21 (1), pp. 8-20.
Almaiah, M. A., Al-lozi, E. M., Al-Khasawneh, A., Shishakly, R., & Nachouki, M. J. E. (2021). Factors Affecting Students’ Acceptance of Mobile Learning Application in Higher Education during COVID-19 Using ANN-SEM Modelling Technique. 10(24), 3121.
Alshurafat, H., Shbail, A., Obeid, M., Masadeh, W. M., Dahmash, F., & Al-Msiedeen, J. M. (2021). Factors affecting online accounting education during the COVID-19 pandemic: an integrated perspective of social capital theory, the theory of reasoned action and the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6995-7013.
Appuhamilage, K. S. M., Torii, H. J. H. E. E., & Development. (2019). The impact of loyalty on the student satisfaction in higher education: A structural equation modeling analysis.
Bray, E., Aoki, K., Dlugosh, L. J. I. R. o. R. i. O., & Learning, D. (2008). Predictors of learning satisfaction in Japanese online distance learners. 9(3), 1-24.
Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2018). Predicting students’ intention to adopt mobile learning: A combination of theory of reasoned action and technology acceptance model. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning.
Davis, F. D. J. M. q. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. 319-340.
Doll, W. J., Hendrickson, A., & Deng, X. (1998). Using Davis's perceived usefulness and ease‐of‐use instruments for decision making: a confirmatory and multigroup invariance analysis. Decision sciences, 29(4), 839-869.
Elkaseh, A. M., Wong, K. W., Fung, C. C. J. I. J. o. I., & Technology, E. (2016). Perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of social media for e-learning in Libyan higher education: A structural equation modeling analysis. 6(3), 192.
Han, J.-H., & Sa, H. J. (2022). Acceptance of and satisfaction with online educational classes through the technology acceptance model (TAM): The COVID-19 situation in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(3), 403-415.
Hao, S., Dennen, V. P., Mei, L. J. E. T. R., & Development. (2017). Influential factors for mobile learning acceptance among Chinese users. 65(1), 101-123.
Hoyer, W. D., Macinnis, D. J., & Pieters, R. J. B., Houghton Mifflin Company. (2001). Customer behavior.
Hussein, Z. J. P. C. S. (2017). Leading to intention: The role of attitude in relation to technology acceptance model in e-learning. 105, 159-164.
Ibrahim, A. H., Mutiarin, D., Purnomo, E. P. J. J. o. G., & Policy, P. (2021). E-Services in Sudan during the Covid-19 pandemic as a model: A case study of University of Bahri-Sudan. 8(2), 165-183.
Isnain, A. R., Gunawan, R. D., Wahyudi, A. D., & Yani, D. C. (2021). Analysis of The Effect of Promotion an Technology Acceptance Model on Purchase Interest in Tokopedia. Paper presented at the 2021 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology, and Electrical Engineering (ICOMITEE).
Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., Kim, E. K. J. C., & education. (2011). Online university students' satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. 57(2), 1654-1664.
Jung, H.-S., & Yoon, H.-H. J. S. (2021). Generational effects of workplace flexibility on work engagement, satisfaction, and commitment in South Korean deluxe hotels. 13(16), 9143.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. (2012). Marketing Management (14th Edition).
Kumar, B. A., Chand, S. S. J. E., & technologies, i. (2019). Mobile learning adoption: A systematic review. 24(1), 471-487.
Lazim, C., Ismail, N. D. B., & Tazilah, M. (2021). Application of technology acceptance model (TAM) towards online learning during covid-19 pandemic: Accounting students perspective. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Law, 24(1), 13-20.
Mailizar, M., Burg, D., & Maulina, S. (2021). Examining university students’ behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7057-7077.
OSMAN, R. B., CHOO, P. S., & Rahmat, M. K. (2013). Understanding student teachers’ behavioural intention to use technology: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) validation and testing. International Journal of Instruction, 6(1).
Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162.
Prokopenko, I., & Berezhna, S. (2020). Higher education institutions in Ukraine during the coronavirus, or COVID-19, outbreak: new challenges vs new opportunities.
Rhema, A., Miliszewska, I., & Sztendur, E. (2013). Attitudes towards e-learning and satisfaction with technology among engineering students and instructors in Libya. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the informing science and information technology education conference.
Sabah, N. M. J. C. i. H. B. (2016). Exploring students' awareness and perceptions: Influencing factors and individual differences driving m-learning adoption. 65, 522-533.
Sekaran, U. (2010). Research Methods for Business (Vol. Volume 4).
Shao, C. (2020). An empirical study on the identification of driving factors of satisfaction with online learning based on TAM. Paper presented at the 5th international conference on economics, management, law and education (EMLE 2019).
Shin, D. (2021). The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 146, 102551.
Shin, W. S., Kang, M. J. I. R. o. R. i. O., & Learning, D. (2015). The use of a mobile learning management system at an online university and its effect on learning satisfaction and achievement. 16(3), 110-130.
Sukendro, S., Habibi, A., Khaeruddin, K., Indrayana, B., Syahruddin, S., Makadada, F. A., & Hakim, H. (2020). Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model to understand students’ use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sport science education context. Heliyon, 6(11), e05410.
Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., Yeh, D. J. C., & education. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. 50(4), 1183-1202.
Tahar, A., Riyadh, H. A., Sofyani, H., Purnomo, W. E. J. T. J. o. A. F., Economics, & Business. (2020). Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived security and intention to use e-filing: The role of technology readiness. 7(9), 537-547.
Tan, G. W.-H., Ooi, K.-B., Leong, L.-Y., & Lin, B. J. C. i. H. B. (2014). Predicting the drivers of behavioral intention to use mobile learning: A hybrid SEM-Neural Networks approach. 36, 198-213.
Tung, F.-C., Chang, S.-C., & Chou, C.-M. (2008). An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(5), 324-335.
Vargas-Sánchez, A., Plaza-Mejía, M., Porras-Bueno, N. J. E. o. T., & Jafari, J., Xiao, H., Eds. (2016). Attitude. 58-62.
Zhu, Y., Zhang, J. H., Au, W., Yates, G. J. E. t. r., & development. (2020). University students’ online learning attitudes and continuous intention to undertake online courses: A self-regulated learning perspective. 68(3), 1485-1519.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.apmba.2023.011.03.5
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.